Athlon 64 X2 3800+ vs Ryzen 5 2500U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2500U and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1307not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Manchester (2005−2006)
Release date26 October 2017 (6 years ago)August 2005 (18 years ago)
Current price$674 $87

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2500U and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)256K
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm90 nm
Die size246 mm2220 mm2
Number of transistors4500 Million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2500U and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5939
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and Athlon 64 X2 3800+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and Athlon 64 X2 3800+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and Athlon 64 X2 3800+.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 2500U 6552
+942%
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ 629

Ryzen 5 2500U outperforms Athlon 64 X2 3800+ by 942% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 2500U 809
+299%
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ 203

Ryzen 5 2500U outperforms Athlon 64 X2 3800+ by 299% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 2500U 2334
+521%
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ 376

Ryzen 5 2500U outperforms Athlon 64 X2 3800+ by 521% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 89 Watt

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 2500U and Athlon 64 X2 3800+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 2500U is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 3800+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2500U and Athlon 64 X2 3800+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
Ryzen 5 2500U
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+
Athlon 64 X2 3800+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1057 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 92 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2500U or Athlon 64 X2 3800+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.