Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Ryzen 5 2400G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2400G
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.64
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 120 Watt
22.20
+294%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G by a whopping 294% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 7 7800X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1064214
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.5435.77
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Raphael (Zen4)
Release date12 February 2018 (6 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169$449
Current price$106 (0.6x MSRP)$560 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 7800X3D has 146% better value for money than Ryzen 5 2400G.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 7 7800X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.6 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)96 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size210 mm271 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data89 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors4,950 million6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 7 7800X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4AM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 7 7800X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT86x MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 7 7800X3D are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5-5200
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1224

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 2400G 5.64
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 22.20
+294%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G by 294% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 2400G 8729
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 34339
+293%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G by 293% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 2400G 1054
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 2719
+158%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G by 158% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 2400G 3286
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 15161
+361%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G by 361% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 5 2400G 4805
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8026
+67%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G by 67% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 2400G 21024
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 51950
+147%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G by 147% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 2400G 6672
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 16892
+153%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G by 153% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 5 2400G 6.9
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 2.44
+183%

Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Ryzen 7 7800X3D by 183% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 5 2400G 9
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 33
+254%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G by 254% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 2400G 847
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 2879
+240%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G by 240% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 2400G 156
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 282
+80.9%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G by 81% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 5 2400G 1.77
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 3.43
+93.8%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G by 94% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 2400G 5.2
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 15.3
+194%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G by 194% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 2400G 3846
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 16585
+331%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G by 331% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 2400G 48
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 169
+253%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G by 253% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 2400G 172
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 344
+100%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G by 100% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.64 22.20
Integrated graphics card 5.48 4.34
Recency 12 February 2018 4 January 2023
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Cost $169 $449
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 120 Watt

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 2400G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 7 7800X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Ryzen 5 2400G
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1327 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1179 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7800X3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2400G or Ryzen 7 7800X3D, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.