Ultra 5 135H vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 5 135H outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G by a whopping 159% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 2400G and Core Ultra 5 135H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1163 | 507 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.09 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | Intel Meteor Lake-H |
| Power efficiency | 8.01 | 48.23 |
| Architecture codename | Raven Ridge (2017−2018) | Meteor Lake-H (2023) |
| Release date | 12 February 2018 (6 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | $342 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 2400G and Core Ultra 5 135H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 18 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Multiplier | 36 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128K (per core) | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 18 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 110 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,950 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 2400G and Core Ultra 5 135H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | Intel BGA 2049 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Core Ultra 5 135H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 2400G and Core Ultra 5 135H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Core Ultra 5 135H are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Core Ultra 5 135H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1250 MHz) | Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU ( - 2200 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Core Ultra 5 135H.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.50 | 14.27 |
| Integrated graphics card | 5.48 | 17.20 |
| Recency | 12 February 2018 | 14 December 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 14 |
| Threads | 8 | 18 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ultra 5 135H has a 159.5% higher aggregate performance score, 213.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, 250% more physical cores and 125% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 132.1% lower power consumption.
The Core Ultra 5 135H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 2400G in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 5 2400G is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 5 135H is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2400G and Core Ultra 5 135H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
