FX-770K vs Ryzen 5 1600X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 1600X
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
8.45
+349%

Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms FX-770K by a whopping 349% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600X and FX-770K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking8461894
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.91no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date11 April 2017 (7 years ago)December 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249no data
Current price$114 (0.5x MSRP)$28

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600X and FX-770K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache96K (per core)256K
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size192 mm2245 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600X and FX-770K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and FX-770K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and FX-770K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and FX-770K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-2133
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and FX-770K.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1600X 8.45
+349%
FX-770K 1.88

Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms FX-770K by 349% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 1600X 13062
+348%
FX-770K 2915

Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms FX-770K by 348% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.45 1.88
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 5 1600X is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-770K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600X and FX-770K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Ryzen 5 1600X
AMD FX-770K
FX-770K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 851 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 1600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate FX-770K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600X or FX-770K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.