EPYC Embedded 3451 vs Ryzen 5 1600X
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1142 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.36 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | AMD EPYC Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 8.33 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 16 March 2017 (8 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | $880 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 1600X and EPYC Embedded 3451 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.15 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.15 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 36 | 21.5 |
| L1 cache | 576 KB | 1536 KB |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4800 Million | 9600 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 1600X and EPYC Embedded 3451 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM4 | AMD BGA SP4r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 100 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and EPYC Embedded 3451. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and EPYC Embedded 3451 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and EPYC Embedded 3451. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 1 TiB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | 85.33 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and EPYC Embedded 3451.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 64 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 16 March 2017 | 21 February 2018 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 16 |
| Threads | 12 | 32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 100 Watt |
Ryzen 5 1600X has 5.3% lower power consumption.
EPYC Embedded 3451, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 5 1600X and AMD EPYC Embedded 3451. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 1600X is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 3451 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
