EPYC 7542 vs Ryzen 5 1600X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 1600X
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
8.22
EPYC 7542
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 225 Watt
28.33
+245%

EPYC 7542 outperforms Ryzen 5 1600X by a whopping 245% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600X and EPYC 7542 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking923162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.545.33
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD EPYC
Power efficiency8.1511.85
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date11 April 2017 (7 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249$3,400

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7542 has 17% better value for money than Ryzen 5 1600X.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600X and EPYC 7542 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1264
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3629
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size192 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600X and EPYC 7542 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and EPYC 7542. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and EPYC 7542 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and EPYC 7542. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and EPYC 7542.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1600X 8.22
EPYC 7542 28.33
+245%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 1600X 13055
EPYC 7542 45003
+245%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 1600X 1135
+6.4%
EPYC 7542 1067

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 1600X 4760
EPYC 7542 8564
+79.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.22 28.33
Recency 11 April 2017 7 August 2019
Physical cores 6 32
Threads 12 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 225 Watt

Ryzen 5 1600X has 136.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7542, on the other hand, has a 244.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 433.3% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7542 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 1600X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 1600X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7542 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600X and EPYC 7542, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Ryzen 5 1600X
AMD EPYC 7542
EPYC 7542

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 919 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 8 votes

Rate EPYC 7542 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600X or EPYC 7542, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.