Core i7-5820K vs Ryzen 5 1600X
Aggregated performance score
Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Core i7-5820K by 32% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
Comparing Ryzen 5 1600X and Core i7-5820K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 815 | 965 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 14.32 | 3.15 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Haswell-E (2014) |
| Release date | 11 April 2017 (7 years old) | 1 September 2014 (9 years old) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | $410 |
| Current price | $140 (0.6x MSRP) | $181 (0.4x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 5 1600X has 355% better value for money than i7-5820K.
Technical specs
Ryzen 5 1600X and Core i7-5820K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 15 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 356 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 67 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 2,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 1600X and Core i7-5820K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | FCLGA2011 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 140 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Core i7-5820K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| Smart Response | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 1600X and Core i7-5820K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Core i7-5820K are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Core i7-5820K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | 68 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Core i7-5820K.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 28 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Core i7-5820K by 32% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Core i7-5820K by 33% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i7-5820K outperforms Ryzen 5 1600X by 3% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i7-5820K outperforms Ryzen 5 1600X by 15% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 8.45 | 6.38 |
| Recency | 11 April 2017 | 1 September 2014 |
| Cost | $249 | $410 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 140 Watt |
The Ryzen 5 1600X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-5820K in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600X and Core i7-5820K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
