Xeon w9-3595X vs Ryzen 5 1600AF

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600AF and Xeon w9-3595X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated13
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.42
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiencyno data15.47
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date11 October 2019 (5 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600AF and Xeon w9-3595X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)60 (Hexaconta-Core)
Performance-coresno data60
Threads12120
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)112.5 MB
Chip lithography12 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size192 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600AF and Xeon w9-3595X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt385 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600AF and Xeon w9-3595X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 1600AF and Xeon w9-3595X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600AF and Xeon w9-3595X are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600AF and Xeon w9-3595X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600AF and Xeon w9-3595X.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 2019 24 August 2024
Physical cores 6 60
Threads 12 120
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 385 Watt

Ryzen 5 1600AF has 492.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3595X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 1600AF and Xeon w9-3595X. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 5 1600AF is a desktop processor while Xeon w9-3595X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600AF and Xeon w9-3595X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF
Ryzen 5 1600AF
Intel Xeon w9-3595X
Xeon w9-3595X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 281 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 1600AF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 41 vote

Rate Xeon w9-3595X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600AF or Xeon w9-3595X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.