Ryzen 3 7320C vs Ryzen 5 1600AF
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 1600AF and Ryzen 3 7320C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1155 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 34.20 |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 11 October 2019 (5 years ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 1600AF and Ryzen 3 7320C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 100 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 1600AF and Ryzen 3 7320C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | FT6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600AF and Ryzen 3 7320C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600AF and Ryzen 3 7320C are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600AF and Ryzen 3 7320C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 610M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600AF and Ryzen 3 7320C.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 October 2019 | 23 May 2023 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 5 1600AF has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
Ryzen 3 7320C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 1600AF and Ryzen 3 7320C. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 1600AF is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 7320C is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600AF and Ryzen 3 7320C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
