EPYC 8324PN vs Ryzen 5 1600AF
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1403 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.55 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 1.55 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 11 October 2019 (6 years ago) | 18 September 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,125 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 1600AF and EPYC 8324PN basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 4x 73 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 35,500 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 1600AF and EPYC 8324PN compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | SP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600AF and EPYC 8324PN. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600AF and EPYC 8324PN are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600AF and EPYC 8324PN. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600AF and EPYC 8324PN.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 96 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 October 2019 | 18 September 2023 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 32 |
| Threads | 12 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 130 Watt |
Ryzen 5 1600AF has 100% lower power consumption.
EPYC 8324PN, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 433.3% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF and AMD EPYC 8324PN. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 1600AF is a desktop processor while EPYC 8324PN is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
