A4-9120e SoC vs Ryzen 5 1600AF
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 11 October 2019 (6 years ago) | 7 January 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 1600AF and A4-9120e SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 1600AF and A4-9120e SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | FT4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600AF and A4-9120e SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600AF and A4-9120e SoC are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600AF and A4-9120e SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Radeon R3 2CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600AF and A4-9120e SoC.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 October 2019 | 7 January 2019 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6 Watt |
Ryzen 5 1600AF has an age advantage of 9 months, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.
A4-9120e SoC, on the other hand, has 983.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF and AMD A4-9120e SoC. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 1600AF is a desktop processor while A4-9120e SoC is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
