Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Ryzen 5 1600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 1600
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
7.66
+3382%
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 81 Watt
0.22

Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ by a whopping 3382% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9803217
Place by popularity65not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.19no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Mobile Athlon 64
Power efficiency11.230.26
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release date11 April 2017 (7 years ago)August 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$219no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads121
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s800 MHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache96K (per core)128K
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nmno data
Die size192 mm2193 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4754
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt81 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR1
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1600 7.66
+3382%
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ 0.22

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 1600 12276
+3348%
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ 356

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.66 0.22
Physical cores 6 1
Threads 12 1
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 81 Watt

Ryzen 5 1600 has a 3381.8% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and 24.6% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 1600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 1600 is a desktop processor while Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Ryzen 5 1600
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 5892 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600 or Mobile Athlon 64 3700+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.