EPYC 7281 vs Ryzen 5 1600

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 5 1600
2017
6 cores / 12 threads
7.94
EPYC 7281
2017
16 cores / 32 threads
13.98
+76.1%

EPYC 7281 outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 76% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600 and EPYC 7281 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking858471
Place by popularity53not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.343.57
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date11 April 2017 (7 years ago)29 June 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$219$650
Current price$140 (0.6x MSRP)$1299 (2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 1600 has 246% better value for money than EPYC 7281.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600 and EPYC 7281 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1232
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600 and EPYC 7281 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and EPYC 7281. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and EPYC 7281 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and EPYC 7281. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and EPYC 7281.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1600 7.94
EPYC 7281 13.98
+76.1%

EPYC 7281 outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 76% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 1600 12286
EPYC 7281 21621
+76%

EPYC 7281 outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 76% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.94 13.98
Recency 11 April 2017 29 June 2017
Physical cores 6 16
Threads 12 32
Cost $219 $650
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 170 Watt

The EPYC 7281 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 1600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 1600 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7281 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600 and EPYC 7281, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Ryzen 5 1600
AMD EPYC 7281
EPYC 7281

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 5366 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 17 votes

Rate EPYC 7281 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600 or EPYC 7281, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.