Ultra 7 165H vs Ryzen 5 1600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 1600
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.02
Core Ultra 7 165H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
17.14
+114%

Core Ultra 7 165H outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by a whopping 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600 and Core Ultra 7 165H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking946392
Place by popularity44not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.48no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Meteor Lake-H
Power efficiency11.2555.82
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Release date16 March 2017 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$219$460

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600 and Core Ultra 7 165H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1222
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache576 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 4 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data110 °C
Number of transistors4800 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600 and Core Ultra 7 165H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Core Ultra 7 165H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 1600 and Core Ultra 7 165H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Core Ultra 7 165H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Core Ultra 7 165H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GB96 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel® Arc™ graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency-2.3 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 1600 and Core Ultra 7 165H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Core Ultra 7 165H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4-4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP-3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort-7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Core Ultra 7 165H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-12.2
OpenGL-4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Core Ultra 7 165H.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes208
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1600 8.02
Ultra 7 165H 17.14
+114%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 1600 12278
Ultra 7 165H 26236
+114%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 5 1600 1129
Ultra 7 165H 2641
+134%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 5 1600 147
Ultra 7 165H 257
+74.8%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 5 1600 5425
Ultra 7 165H 12052
+122%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 5 1600 404
+64.3%
Ultra 7 165H 246

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 5 1600 950
Ultra 7 165H 1794
+88.8%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 5 1600 3834
Ultra 7 165H 5273
+37.5%

7-Zip

Ryzen 5 1600 30144
Ultra 7 165H 56997
+89.1%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 5 1600 180
Ultra 7 165H 293
+62.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.02 17.14
Recency 16 March 2017 14 December 2023
Physical cores 6 16
Threads 12 22
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 28 Watt

Ultra 7 165H has a 113.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 83.3% more threads, and 132.1% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 165H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 1600 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 1600 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 165H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600 and Core Ultra 7 165H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Ryzen 5 1600
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
Core Ultra 7 165H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 5740 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 42 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 165H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600 or Core Ultra 7 165H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.