Celeron M 550 vs Ryzen 5 1600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600 and Celeron M 550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking881not rated
Place by popularity51not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.38no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Celeron M
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date11 April 2017 (7 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$219no data
Current price$115 (0.5x MSRP)$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600 and Celeron M 550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads121
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2 GHz
Bus supportno data533 MHz
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache16 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600 and Celeron M 550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Celeron M 550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Celeron M 550 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Celeron M 550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Celeron M 550.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 1600 12283
+2542%
Celeron M 550 465

Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Celeron M 550 by 2542% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 5 1600 4538
+147%
Celeron M 550 1834

Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Celeron M 550 by 147% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 1600 8244
+840%
Celeron M 550 877

Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Celeron M 550 by 840% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 1
Threads 12 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 30 Watt

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 1600 and Celeron M 550. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 5 1600 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 550 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600 and Celeron M 550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Ryzen 5 1600
Intel Celeron M 550
Celeron M 550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 5516 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 27 votes

Rate Celeron M 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600 or Celeron M 550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.