A4-9120C vs Ryzen 5 1600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 1600
2017, $219
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
6.95
+1290%

Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms A4-9120C by a whopping 1290% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11673114
Place by popularity40not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.39no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency4.543.54
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date11 April 2017 (8 years ago)6 January 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$219no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600 and A4-9120C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3216
L1 cache96K (per core)160 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size192 mm2124.5 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600 and A4-9120C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4BGA
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and A4-9120C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTVirtualization,
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and A4-9120C are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and A4-9120C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s14.936 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and A4-9120C.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 5 1600 6.95
+1290%
A4-9120C 0.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 5 1600 12261
+1285%
Samples: 8822
A4-9120C 885
Samples: 33

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.95 0.50
Recency 11 April 2017 6 January 2019
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

Ryzen 5 1600 has a 1290% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

A4-9120C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A4-9120C in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 1600 is a desktop processor while A4-9120C is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Ryzen 5 1600
AMD A4-9120C
A4-9120C

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 6336 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 97 votes

Rate A4-9120C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 5 1600 and A4-9120C, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.