i7-10700KF vs Ryzen 5 1300
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 1300 and Core i7-10700KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 669 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | no data | 8.79 |
Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Comet Lake (2020) |
Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 1300 and Core i7-10700KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | no data | 16 |
Base clock speed | no data | 3.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 8 GT/s |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 192 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
Number of transistors | 4800 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 1300 and Core i7-10700KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | AM4 | FCLGA1200 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1300 and Core i7-10700KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 1300 and Core i7-10700KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
Identity Protection | - | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1300 and Core i7-10700KF are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1300 and Core i7-10700KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-2933 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 45.8 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1300 and Core i7-10700KF.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
Ryzen 5 1300 has 92.3% lower power consumption.
i7-10700KF, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 1300 and Core i7-10700KF. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1300 and Core i7-10700KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.