Athlon XP-M 2500+ vs Ryzen 5 1300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Barton (2001−2004)
Release dateno dataJanuary 2001 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1300 and Athlon XP-M 2500+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threadsno data1
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.86 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm130 nm
Die size192 mm2101 mm2
Number of transistors4800 million63 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1300 and Athlon XP-M 2500+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4A
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1300 and Athlon XP-M 2500+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1300 and Athlon XP-M 2500+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen 5 1300 has 300% more physical cores, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon XP-M 2500+, on the other hand, has 44% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 5 1300 and AMD Athlon XP-M 2500+. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 5 1300 is a desktop processor while Athlon XP-M 2500+ is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 19 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon XP-M 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 5 1300 and Athlon XP-M 2500+, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.