Ultra 5 245KF vs Ryzen 4700S
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 4700S and Core Ultra 5 245KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 168 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 79.32 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | no data | 21.16 |
| Architecture codename | Cardinal (2021) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 26 June 2021 (3 years ago) | 24 October 2024 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $294 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 4700S and Core Ultra 5 245KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 14 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 308 mm2 | 243 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10,600 million | 17,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 4700S and Core Ultra 5 245KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AMD BGA 2197 | 1851 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 4700S and Core Ultra 5 245KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 4700S and Core Ultra 5 245KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 4700S and Core Ultra 5 245KF are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 4700S and Core Ultra 5 245KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | unknown Depends on motherboard | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 4700S and Core Ultra 5 245KF.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 26 June 2021 | 24 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 14 |
| Threads | 16 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
Ryzen 4700S has 14.3% more threads, and 92.3% lower power consumption.
Ultra 5 245KF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 75% more physical cores, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 4700S and Core Ultra 5 245KF. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 4700S and Core Ultra 5 245KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
