Xeon Phi 7290 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Phi 7290 outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1168 | 891 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | 50.61 | 4.43 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Barcelo-R (2023) | Knights Landing (2016) |
| Release date | 4 January 2023 (2 years ago) | 20 June 2016 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U and Xeon Phi 7290 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 72 (Doheptaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 288 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 32 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 0 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 180 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10,700 million | 8,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U and Xeon Phi 7290 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP6 | 3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 245 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U and Xeon Phi 7290. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U and Xeon Phi 7290 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U and Xeon Phi 7290 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U and Xeon Phi 7290. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics (Vega 6) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U and Xeon Phi 7290.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 7.08 | 10.12 |
| Recency | 4 January 2023 | 20 June 2016 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 72 |
| Threads | 8 | 288 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 245 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1533.3% lower power consumption.
Xeon Phi 7290, on the other hand, has a 42.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 1700% more physical cores and 3500% more threads.
The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U is a notebook processor while Xeon Phi 7290 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
