Ryzen 7 3700U vs Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U
2023
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
8.00
+72.4%

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U and Ryzen 7 3700U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9281282
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameBarcelo-R (2023)Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U and Ryzen 7 3700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data23
L1 cache64K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography7 nm12 nm
Die size180 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors10,700 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U and Ryzen 7 3700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP6FP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U and Ryzen 7 3700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U and Ryzen 7 3700U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U and Ryzen 7 3700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon GraphicsAMD Radeon RX Vega 10

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U and Ryzen 7 3700U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U 8.00
+72.4%
Ryzen 7 3700U 4.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U 12331
+72.3%
Ryzen 7 3700U 7156

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U 1665
+79.8%
Ryzen 7 3700U 926

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U 4358
+62.2%
Ryzen 7 3700U 2686

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.00 4.64
Integrated graphics card 1.98 4.24
Recency 4 January 2023 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U has a 72.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 7 3700U, on the other hand, has 114.1% faster integrated GPU.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 3700U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U and Ryzen 7 3700U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U
Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
Ryzen 7 3700U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1427 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U or Ryzen 7 3700U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.