Xeon Platinum 8260 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
7.19
Xeon Platinum 8260
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
17.27
+140%

Xeon Platinum 8260 outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE by a whopping 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1113395
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.54
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3Intel Xeon Platinum
Power efficiency8.684.42
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameCezanne (2021−2024)Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
Release date1 June 2021 (4 years ago)2 April 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,702

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and Xeon Platinum 8260 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads848
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier3624
L1 cache256 KB1.5 MB
L2 cache2 MB24 MB
L3 cache8 MB35.75 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm14 nm
Die size180 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors10,700 million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and Xeon Platinum 8260 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration18 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM4FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and Xeon Platinum 8260. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and Xeon Platinum 8260 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and Xeon Platinum 8260 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and Xeon Platinum 8260. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 6N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and Xeon Platinum 8260.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE 7.19
Xeon Platinum 8260 17.27
+140%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE Samples: 93 12633
Xeon Platinum 8260 Samples: 4 30347
+140%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.19 17.27
Recency 1 June 2021 2 April 2019
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 8 48
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 165 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 371.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8260, on the other hand, has a 140.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8260 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
Xeon Platinum 8260

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 15 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and Xeon Platinum 8260, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.