Celeron M 743 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE outperforms Celeron M 743 by a whopping 5029% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1123 | 3559 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | Intel Celeron M |
Power efficiency | 8.67 | 0.59 |
Designer | AMD | Intel |
Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
Architecture codename | Cezanne (2021−2024) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
Release date | 1 June 2021 (4 years ago) | 1 September 2009 (16 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and Celeron M 743 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
Multiplier | 36 | no data |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 8 MB | no data |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | 180 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 10,700 million | 410 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and Celeron M 743 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | AM4 | BGA965 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and Celeron M 743. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and Celeron M 743 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and Celeron M 743. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 6 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE and Celeron M 743.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 7.18 | 0.14 |
Recency | 1 June 2021 | 1 September 2009 |
Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
Threads | 8 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE has a 5028.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 743, on the other hand, has 250% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M 743 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE is a desktop processor while Celeron M 743 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.