Ryzen 7 5825U vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.88
Ryzen 7 5825U
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
11.87
+206%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U by a whopping 206% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Ryzen 7 5825U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1386612
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2020)Barcelo-U (Zen 3)
Release date8 April 2019 (5 years ago)6 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$718 no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Ryzen 7 5825U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm
Die size246 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors4500 Million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Ryzen 7 5825U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Ryzen 7 5825U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Ryzen 7 5825U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Ryzen 7 5825U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Ryzen 7 5825U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 3.88
Ryzen 7 5825U 11.87
+206%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U by 206% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 5997
Ryzen 7 5825U 18366
+206%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U by 206% in Passmark.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 6
Ryzen 7 5825U 19
+236%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U by 236% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 481
Ryzen 7 5825U 1778
+270%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U by 270% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 126
Ryzen 7 5825U 232
+83.7%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U by 84% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 1.43
Ryzen 7 5825U 2.75
+92.3%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U by 92% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.88 11.87
Integrated graphics card 3.04 9.07
Recency 8 April 2019 6 January 2022
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm

The Ryzen 7 5825U is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Ryzen 7 5825U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U
Ryzen 7 5825U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 25 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 631 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 5825U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U or Ryzen 7 5825U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.