i5-10400H vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.89
Core i5-10400H
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
5.55
+42.7%

Core i5-10400H outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Core i5-10400H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14691162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3Intel Comet Lake
Power efficiency23.6511.25
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Comet Lake-H (2020)
Release date8 April 2019 (5 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Core i5-10400H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache384 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm14 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4940 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Core i5-10400H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Core i5-10400H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Core i5-10400H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Core i5-10400H are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Core i5-10400H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s45.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)Intel® UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Core i5-10400H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Core i5-10400H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Core i5-10400H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Core i5-10400H.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 3.89
i5-10400H 5.55
+42.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 5950
i5-10400H 8496
+42.8%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 6
i5-10400H 10
+74.3%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 481
i5-10400H 796
+65.5%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 126
i5-10400H 192
+52.4%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 1.43
i5-10400H 2.18
+52.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.89 5.55
Recency 8 April 2019 2 April 2020
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

i5-10400H, on the other hand, has a 42.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 100% more threads.

The Core i5-10400H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Core i5-10400H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
Intel Core i5-10400H
Core i5-10400H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 28 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 183 votes

Rate Core i5-10400H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U or Core i5-10400H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.