Celeron N5095 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.74
+45.5%
Celeron N5095
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.57

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U outperforms Celeron N5095 by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Celeron N5095 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14831740
Place by popularitynot in top-10039
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3Intel Jasper Lake
Power efficiency23.4716.13
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date8 April 2019 (5 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Celeron N5095 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache384 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB1.5 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography12 nm10 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors4940 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Celeron N5095 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Celeron N5095. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Celeron N5095 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Celeron N5095 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Celeron N5095. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Celeron N5095.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 3.74
+45.5%
Celeron N5095 2.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 5947
+45.8%
Celeron N5095 4078

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 6
+17.2%
Celeron N5095 5

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 481
+32.1%
Celeron N5095 364

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 126
+18.9%
Celeron N5095 106

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 1.43
+12.6%
Celeron N5095 1.27

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.74 2.57
Integrated graphics card 3.04 5.58
Recency 8 April 2019 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U has a 45.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron N5095, on the other hand, has 83.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5095 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is a notebook processor while Celeron N5095 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Celeron N5095, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
Intel Celeron N5095
Celeron N5095

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 30 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1449 votes

Rate Celeron N5095 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U or Celeron N5095, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.