Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE outperforms Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 by a whopping 630% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1586 | 3075 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | 2x Athlon 64 (Desktop) |
| Power efficiency | 4.69 | 0.20 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Picasso (2019−2022) | Toledo (2006) |
| Release date | 30 September 2019 (6 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | no data | 1000 MHz |
| Multiplier | 33 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,940 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 110 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 8 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.87 | 0.53 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 110 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE has a 630.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 650% more advanced lithography process, and 214.3% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
