Xeon Platinum 8180 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Platinum 8180 outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G by a whopping 488% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1650 | 306 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.73 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | Intel Xeon Platinum |
| Power efficiency | 6.08 | 11.34 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| Release date | 30 September 2019 (6 years ago) | 11 July 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $10,009 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Xeon Platinum 8180 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 56 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Multiplier | 36 | 25 |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 38.5 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 84 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4940 Million | 8,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Xeon Platinum 8180 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 8 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | Socket AM4 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Xeon Platinum 8180. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Security technologies
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Xeon Platinum 8180 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Xeon Platinum 8180 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Xeon Platinum 8180. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 768 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | 128.001 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 8 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Xeon Platinum 8180.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 48 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.69 | 21.70 |
| Recency | 30 September 2019 | 11 July 2017 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 28 |
| Threads | 4 | 56 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 205 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 215.4% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8180, on the other hand, has a 488.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads.
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8180 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
