FX-8350 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads
4.52
+17.7%

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G outperforms FX-8350 by 18% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and FX-8350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking12291364
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation15.570.94
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD FX-Series (Desktop)
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2020)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date30 September 2019 (4 years ago)23 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Current price$132 $200

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has 1556% better value for money than FX-8350.

Detailed Specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and FX-8350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.6 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache384 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB8192 KB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography12 nm32 nm
Die size209.78 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data61 °C
Number of transistors4940 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoYes
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and FX-8350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket AM4AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and FX-8350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and FX-8350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and FX-8350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and FX-8350.

PCIe version3.0n/a
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 4.52
+17.7%
FX-8350 3.84

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G outperforms FX-8350 by 18% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 6991
+17.8%
FX-8350 5936

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G outperforms FX-8350 by 18% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 4.52 3.84
Recency 30 September 2019 23 October 2012
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 12 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and FX-8350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
AMD FX-8350
FX-8350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 115 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3355 votes

Rate FX-8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G or FX-8350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.