Celeron J4115 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G outperforms Celeron J4115 by a whopping 160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Celeron J4115 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1254 | 1946 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 14.57 | 0.78 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | Intel Gemini Lake |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2020) | Gemini Lake (2019) |
| Release date | 30 September 2019 (4 years ago) | 4 November 2019 (4 years ago) |
| Current price | $132 | $888 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has 1768% better value for money than Celeron J4115.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Celeron J4115 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4940 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Celeron J4115 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Socket AM4 | FCBGA1090 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Celeron J4115. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | no data |
| vPro | no data | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| Smart Response | no data | - |
| GPIO | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Celeron J4115 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| MPX | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Celeron J4115 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Celeron J4115. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
| Max video memory | no data | 8 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 750 MHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 12 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Celeron J4115 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | no data | + |
| HDMI | no data | + |
| MIPI-DSI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Celeron J4115 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | no data | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Celeron J4115 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.4 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Celeron J4115.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 6 |
| USB revision | no data | 2.0/3.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 8 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | - |
| UART | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G outperforms Celeron J4115 by 160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G outperforms Celeron J4115 by 160% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.52 | 1.74 |
| Integrated graphics card | 4.50 | 0.86 |
| Recency | 30 September 2019 | 4 November 2019 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 10 Watt |
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4115 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Celeron J4115, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
