Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 666 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Ryzen 3 | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.87 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| Release date | 7 January 2018 (7 years ago) | 5 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4500 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 54 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz) | AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 2.75 | 13.04 |
| Recency | 7 January 2018 | 5 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 54 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U has 260% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, on the other hand, has 374.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
