EPYC 9534 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 48 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 2.94 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Ryzen 3 | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 7.66 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 7 January 2018 (7 years ago) | 10 November 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $8,803 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U and EPYC 9534 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.45 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 24.5 |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Die size | no data | 8x 72 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4500 Million | 52,560 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U and EPYC 9534 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | AM4 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U and EPYC 9534. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U and EPYC 9534 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U and EPYC 9534. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 460.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U and EPYC 9534.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 January 2018 | 10 November 2022 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 64 |
| Threads | 4 | 128 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 280 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U has 1766.7% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9534, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 3100% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U and AMD EPYC 9534. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U is a notebook processor while EPYC 9534 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
