Xeon X5670 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.25
+10.7%
Xeon X5670
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.84

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G outperforms Xeon X5670 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Xeon X5670 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13801466
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.06
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3Xeon (Desktop)
Power efficiency6.193.83
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)16 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$67

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Xeon X5670 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speedno data2.93 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.33 GHz
Bus rateno data6400 MHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache384 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size209.78 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data81 °C
Number of transistors4950 Million1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Xeon X5670 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketSocket AM4FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Xeon X5670. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data40 Bit
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Xeon X5670 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Xeon X5670 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Xeon X5670. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB288 GB
Max memory channels23
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s32 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 8no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Xeon X5670.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G 4.25
+10.7%
Xeon X5670 3.84

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G 6745
+10.5%
Xeon X5670 6105

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.25 3.84
Recency 10 May 2018 16 March 2010
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has a 10.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon X5670, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5670 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is a desktop processor while Xeon X5670 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Xeon X5670, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Intel Xeon X5670
Xeon X5670

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 88 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 482 votes

Rate Xeon X5670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G or Xeon X5670, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.