Xeon D-1713NT vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Xeon D-1713NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1300 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | no data |
Power efficiency | 6.62 | no data |
Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | no data |
Release date | 29 June 2017 (7 years ago) | 1 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Xeon D-1713NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 35 | no data |
L1 cache | 96K (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 10 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 192 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Xeon D-1713NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | AM4 | FCBGA2227 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Xeon D-1713NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
QuickAssist | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Xeon D-1713NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Xeon D-1713NT are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Xeon D-1713NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 256 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Xeon D-1713NT.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 20 | 16 |
USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 24 |
Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
Integrated LAN | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 29 June 2017 | 1 January 2022 |
Threads | 4 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
Xeon D-1713NT has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more threads, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 44.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Xeon D-1713NT. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Xeon D-1713NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.