FX-4320 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and FX-4320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1219	1839
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.86	4.00
Market segment	Server	Desktop processor
Series	AMD Ryzen 3	no data
Architecture codename	Zen (2017−2020)	Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date	29 June 2017 (7 years ago)	23 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Current price	$207	$53

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-4320 has 4% better value for money than Ryzen 3 PRO 1300.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and FX-4320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	3.2 GHz	4 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.5 GHz	4.1 GHz
Bus support	4 × 8 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	96K (per core)	192 KB
L2 cache	512K (per core)	4096 KB
L3 cache	8 MB (shared)	4096 KB
Chip lithography	14 nm	32 nm
Die size	192 mm2	315 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	71 °C
Number of transistors	4,800 million	1,200 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	No

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and FX-4320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	AM4	AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and FX-4320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
FMA	no data	+
AVX	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and FX-4320 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and FX-4320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4 Dual-channel	DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size	64 GB	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	42.671 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

-

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and FX-4320.

PCIe version	3.0	Not Listed
PCI Express lanes	20	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 outperforms FX-4320 by 133% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	4.68	2.01
Recency	29 June 2017	23 October 2012
Chip lithography	14 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	95 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and FX-4320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---