E2-3000M vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and E2-3000M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1218not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.89no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD E-Series
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)20 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Current price$207 $31

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and E2-3000M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache96K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size192 mm2228 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and E2-3000M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FS1
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and E2-3000M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSSE4.1/2, 3DNow, DDR3 Memory Controller, Radeon HD 6380G
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and E2-3000M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and E2-3000M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon HD 6380G

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and E2-3000M.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 7234
+983%
E2-3000M 668

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 outperforms E2-3000M by 983% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 1062
+360%
E2-3000M 231

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 outperforms E2-3000M by 360% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 2914
+584%
E2-3000M 426

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 outperforms E2-3000M by 584% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 June 2017 20 December 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and E2-3000M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is a server/workstation processor while E2-3000M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and E2-3000M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
AMD E2-3000M
E2-3000M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 182 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 50 votes

Rate E2-3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 or E2-3000M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.