Xeon 6325P vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
3.61
Xeon 6325P
2025
4 cores / 8 threads, 55 Watt
9.96
+176%

Xeon 6325P outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 by a whopping 176% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1633881
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data76.54
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency5.3617.47
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesIntel
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$281

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Xeon 6325P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2163 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Xeon 6325P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM41700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Xeon 6325P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Xeon 6325P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Xeon 6325P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Xeon 6325P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Xeon 6325P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 3.61
Xeon 6325P 9.96
+176%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 5808
Xeon 6325P 16013
+176%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.61 9.96
Recency 29 June 2017 24 February 2025
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 55 Watt

Xeon 6325P has a 175.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more threads, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 18.2% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon 6325P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
Intel Xeon 6325P
Xeon 6325P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 81 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6325P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Xeon 6325P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.