Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1200

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
3.87
Core Ultra 9 285K
2024
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
43.10
+1014%

Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 by a whopping 1014% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking146053
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data74.35
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency5.6132.46
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s250 MHz
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache96K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size192 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM41851
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 3.87
Ultra 9 285K 43.10
+1014%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 6143
Ultra 9 285K 68460
+1014%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.87 43.10
Recency 29 June 2017 24 October 2024
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 has 92.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has a 1013.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 9 285K is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 78 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 161 vote

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.