EPYC 9135 vs Ryzen 3 8300G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 8300G
2024
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
9.01
EPYC 9135
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
36.56
+306%

EPYC 9135 outperforms Ryzen 3 8300G by a whopping 306% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 8300G and EPYC 9135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking85496
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation32.4729.26
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency13.1117.29
Architecture codenamePhoenix2 (2024)Turin (2024)
Release date8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$176$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 8300G has 11% better value for money than EPYC 9135.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 8300G and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm4 nm
Die size137 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors20,900 million16,630 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 8300G and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 8300G and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 8300G and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 8300G and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 740MN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 8300G and EPYC 9135.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes14128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 8300G 9.01
EPYC 9135 36.56
+306%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 8300G 14316
EPYC 9135 58070
+306%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.01 36.56
Recency 8 January 2024 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 8 32
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 200 Watt

Ryzen 3 8300G has 207.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9135, on the other hand, has a 305.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The EPYC 9135 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 8300G in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 8300G is a desktop processor while EPYC 9135 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 8300G and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 8300G
Ryzen 3 8300G
AMD EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 8300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 8300G or EPYC 9135, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.