EPYC 4364P vs Ryzen 3 8300G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 8300G
2024
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
9.01
EPYC 4364P
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
22.61
+151%

EPYC 4364P outperforms Ryzen 3 8300G by a whopping 151% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 8300G and EPYC 4364P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking854234
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation32.4745.96
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency13.1120.37
Architecture codenamePhoenix2 (2024)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$176$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4364P has 42% better value for money than Ryzen 3 8300G.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 8300G and EPYC 4364P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.4 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm5 nm
Die size137 mm271 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors20,900 million6,570 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 8300G and EPYC 4364P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5AM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 8300G and EPYC 4364P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 8300G and EPYC 4364P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 8300G and EPYC 4364P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 740MAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 8300G and EPYC 4364P.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes1428

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 8300G 9.01
EPYC 4364P 22.61
+151%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 8300G 14316
EPYC 4364P 35909
+151%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.01 22.61
Integrated graphics card 8.29 1.98
Recency 8 January 2024 21 May 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 105 Watt

Ryzen 3 8300G has 318.7% faster integrated GPU, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 61.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4364P, on the other hand, has a 150.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The EPYC 4364P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 8300G in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 8300G is a desktop processor while EPYC 4364P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 8300G and EPYC 4364P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 8300G
Ryzen 3 8300G
AMD EPYC 4364P
EPYC 4364P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 8300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4364P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 8300G or EPYC 4364P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.