i5-14501E vs Ryzen 3 7320U
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 7320U and Core i5-14501E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1142 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 35.14 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 20 September 2022 (2 years ago) | July 2024 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 7320U and Core i5-14501E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 100 mm2 | 215 mm2 |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 7320U and Core i5-14501E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP6 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 7320U and Core i5-14501E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 3 7320U and Core i5-14501E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 7320U and Core i5-14501E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 7320U and Core i5-14501E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon 610M | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 7320U and Core i5-14501E.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 2.85 | 6.15 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 6 |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Ryzen 3 7320U has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.
i5-14501E, on the other hand, has 115.8% faster integrated GPU, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 7320U and Core i5-14501E. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 3 7320U is a notebook processor while Core i5-14501E is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 7320U and Core i5-14501E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
