EPYC 9654 vs Ryzen 3 5300G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 5300G
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
8.15
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
75.70
+829%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Ryzen 3 5300G by a whopping 829% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 5300G and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9346
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.36
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD EPYC
Power efficiency11.8719.90
Architecture codenameCezanne (2021−2024)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date13 April 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 5300G and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)96
Threads8192
Base clock speed4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Multiplier4024
L1 cache256 KB6 MB
L2 cache2 MB96 MB
L3 cache8 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 5300G and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 5300G and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 5300G and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 5300G and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 5300G and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 5300G 8.15
EPYC 9654 75.70
+829%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 5300G 12939
EPYC 9654 120246
+829%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 5300G 1769
EPYC 9654 1837
+3.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 5300G 5489
EPYC 9654 18836
+243%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.15 75.70
Recency 13 April 2021 10 November 2022
Physical cores 4 96
Threads 8 192
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 360 Watt

Ryzen 3 5300G has 453.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654, on the other hand, has a 828.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 5300G in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 5300G is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 5300G and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
Ryzen 3 5300G
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 123 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 5300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 995 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 5300G or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.