Xeon X5687 vs Ryzen 3 4300U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 4300U
2020
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
4.17
+36.3%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms Xeon X5687 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15281816
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.18
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)no data
Power efficiency29.792.52
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameRenoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date6 January 2020 (5 years ago)14 February 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$121

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 4300U and Xeon X5687 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.86 GHz
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm32 nm
Die size156 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C80 °C
Number of transistors9,800 million1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 4300U and Xeon X5687 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP6FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and Xeon X5687. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data40 Bit

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 4300U and Xeon X5687 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and Xeon X5687 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and Xeon X5687. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB288 GB
Max memory channelsno data3
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/s32 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 5 ( - 1400 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and Xeon X5687.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 3 4300U 4.17
+36.3%
Xeon X5687 3.06

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 3 4300U 7359
+36.6%
Samples: 462
Xeon X5687 5386
Samples: 145

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.17 3.06
Recency 6 January 2020 14 February 2011
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 130 Watt

Ryzen 3 4300U has a 36.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 766.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon X5687, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

The AMD Ryzen 3 4300U is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon X5687 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 3 4300U is a notebook processor while Xeon X5687 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
Ryzen 3 4300U
Intel Xeon X5687
Xeon X5687

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1050 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 4300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 53 votes

Rate Xeon X5687 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 3 4300U and Xeon X5687, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.