Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Ryzen 3 4300U
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms Athlon 64 FX-74 by a whopping 658% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1527 | 3082 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.01 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 29.81 | 0.47 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| Release date | 6 January 2020 (5 years ago) | November 2006 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $500 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 4300U and Athlon 64 FX-74 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Multiplier | 27 | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 156 mm2 | 235 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 9800 Million | 227 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 4300U and Athlon 64 FX-74 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP6 | F |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and Athlon 64 FX-74. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and Athlon 64 FX-74 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and Athlon 64 FX-74. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR1 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 68.27 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 5 ( - 1400 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and Athlon 64 FX-74.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.17 | 0.55 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 125 Watt |
Ryzen 3 4300U has a 658.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 3 4300U is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen 3 4300U is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 FX-74 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
