N200 vs Ryzen 3 3350U
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 3350U outperforms N200 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 3350U and N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1499 | 1613 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 23.08 | 50.44 |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | no data |
| Release date | 6 January 2019 (5 years ago) | 1 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 3350U and N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4500 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 3350U and N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3350U and N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz) | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.66 | 3.20 |
| Recency | 6 January 2019 | 1 January 2023 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
Ryzen 3 3350U has a 14.4% higher aggregate performance score.
N200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 150% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 3 3350U is our recommended choice as it beats the N200 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3350U and N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
