Xeon D-1813NT vs Ryzen 3 3250U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 3250U
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.49
Xeon D-1813NT
2023
4 cores / 8 threads, 42 Watt
5.05
+103%

Xeon D-1813NT outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U by a whopping 103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3250U and Xeon D-1813NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17661232
Place by popularity96not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency15.1410.96
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)no data
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)1 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3250U and Xeon D-1813NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache4 MB (shared)10240 KB
Chip lithography14 nmno data
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4500 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3250U and Xeon D-1813NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP5FCBGA2227
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt42 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3250U and Xeon D-1813NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 3250U and Xeon D-1813NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3250U and Xeon D-1813NT are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3250U and Xeon D-1813NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB256 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3250U and Xeon D-1813NT.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1216
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3250U 2.49
Xeon D-1813NT 5.05
+103%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 3250U 3808
Xeon D-1813NT 7732
+103%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.49 5.05
Recency 6 January 2020 1 October 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 4 8
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 42 Watt

Ryzen 3 3250U has 180% lower power consumption.

Xeon D-1813NT, on the other hand, has a 102.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Xeon D-1813NT is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 3250U in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 3 3250U is a notebook processor while Xeon D-1813NT is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3250U and Xeon D-1813NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Ryzen 3 3250U
Intel Xeon D-1813NT
Xeon D-1813NT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2111 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1813NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3250U or Xeon D-1813NT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.