PRO A6-9500E vs Ryzen 3 3200U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 3200U
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.38
+127%
PRO A6-9500E
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.05

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms PRO A6-9500E by a whopping 127% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3200U and PRO A6-9500E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17772426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency15.022.84
Architecture codenamePicasso-U (Zen) (2019)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)3 October 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3200U and PRO A6-9500E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography12 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Number of transistors4940 Million3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3200U and PRO A6-9500E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5AM4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3200U and PRO A6-9500E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3200U and PRO A6-9500E are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3200U and PRO A6-9500E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 3 3200U and PRO A6-9500E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 3 3200U and PRO A6-9500E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3200U and PRO A6-9500E.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3200U 2.38
+127%
PRO A6-9500E 1.05

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 3200U 3784
+128%
PRO A6-9500E 1662

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.38 1.05
Recency 6 January 2019 3 October 2016
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 3 3200U has a 126.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 3200U is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A6-9500E in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 3 3200U is a notebook processor while PRO A6-9500E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3200U and PRO A6-9500E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
Ryzen 3 3200U
AMD PRO A6-9500E
PRO A6-9500E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1457 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate PRO A6-9500E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3200U or PRO A6-9500E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.