Xeon D-2799 vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Aggregate performance score
Xeon D-2799 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G by a whopping 383% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1584 | 360 |
| Place by popularity | 27 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 8.90 | 7.95 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 6.54 | 15.92 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Picasso (2019−2022) | Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 7 July 2019 (6 years ago) | 24 February 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | $1,972 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 3 3200G has 12% better value for money than Xeon D-2799.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 3200G and Xeon D-2799 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 20 |
| Threads | 4 | 40 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Multiplier | 36 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 30 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,940 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 3200G and Xeon D-2799 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA2579 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 129 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Xeon D-2799. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 3 3200G and Xeon D-2799 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Xeon D-2799 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Xeon D-2799. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 8 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Xeon D-2799.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 32 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 24 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.97 | 19.17 |
| Recency | 7 July 2019 | 24 February 2022 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 20 |
| Threads | 4 | 40 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 129 Watt |
Ryzen 3 3200G has 98.5% lower power consumption.
Xeon D-2799, on the other hand, has a 382.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Xeon D-2799 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 3 3200G is a desktop processor while Xeon D-2799 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
