Processor U300 vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Aggregate performance score
Processor U300 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1626 | 1431 |
| Place by popularity | 28 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 8.90 | 17.44 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | Intel Raptor Lake-U |
| Power efficiency | 2.59 | 14.06 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Picasso (2019−2022) | Raptor Lake-U (2023) |
| Release date | 7 July 2019 (6 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | $193 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Processor U300 has 96% better value for money than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 3200G and Processor U300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 5 (Penta-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | no data | 55 MHz |
| Multiplier | 36 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,940 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 3200G and Processor U300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Processor U300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 3 3200G and Processor U300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Processor U300 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Processor U300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 8 | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1100 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Processor U300.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.99 | 5.00 |
| Integrated graphics card | 4.15 | 4.32 |
| Recency | 7 July 2019 | 4 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 5 |
| Threads | 4 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Processor U300 has a 25% higher aggregate performance score, 4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 25% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 333% lower power consumption.
The Intel Processor U300 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 3 3200G is a desktop processor while Processor U300 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
