Ultra 7 256V vs Ryzen 3 3200G

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.57
Core Ultra 7 256V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.39
+171%

Core Ultra 7 256V outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G by a whopping 171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3200G and Core Ultra 7 256V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1313631
Place by popularity29not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.90no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency6.5367.69
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date12 June 2019 (5 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3200G and Core Ultra 7 256V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Bus rateno data37 MHz
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache384 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm3 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4940 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3200G and Core Ultra 7 256V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Core Ultra 7 256V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 3200G and Core Ultra 7 256V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Core Ultra 7 256V are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Core Ultra 7 256V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)Arc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Core Ultra 7 256V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes204

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3200G 4.57
Ultra 7 256V 12.39
+171%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 3200G 7128
Ultra 7 256V 19320
+171%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.57 12.39
Recency 12 June 2019 24 September 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 12 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 7 256V has a 171.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 282.4% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 256V is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 3200G in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 3200G is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 256V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3200G and Core Ultra 7 256V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Ryzen 3 3200G
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
Core Ultra 7 256V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3104 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 256V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3200G or Core Ultra 7 256V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.